|

New coupling design helps eliminate spillage,
contamination in UHP chemical lines
Coupling designs can solve many problems facing users who must
efficiently handle aggressive chemicals. Traditional poppet-style
designs spill a significant amount of fluid when disconnected.
Also, ultrapure fluids can be contaminated by the metallic spring
in the flow path of most couplings.
A new, patented design from Colder Products (St. Paul, MN)
eliminates both of these problems and has other advantages as
well. The ChemQuik CQN08 series quick-disconnect couplings were
developed forhigh-flow, ultrapure chemical applications. These
couplings feature a nonspill design that allows safe, instant,
spill-free, reliable line disconnects and a metal-free, spring-free
flow path for smooth, unrestricted flow rates up to 40 gal/min.
They provide an economical solution for minimizing downtime and
reducing total maintenance costs in chemical process systems,
leading to increased yield and improved operator safety.
One major adoptee of the new coupling is Ashland Specialty
Chemical's fab services group (Austin, TX), which employs
the component for the transfer of drummed chemicals to a day tank
for subsequent use in the fab. "The spillage is the lowest of
any coupling around," according to Darrell Morris, a senior equipment
technician with Ashland. "It is a well-engineered product, with
advantages such as its high flow rate and the ease of connecting
and disconnecting." The chemicals that Ashland deploys using the
coupling include sulfuric acid, hydrofluoric acid, phosphoric
acid, ammonium hydroxide, and hydrogen peroxide, the technician
says.
Thomas Braun, Colder's business unit manager and a copatent
holder for the new coupling, addresses the question of spillage.
"The amount of spillage is directly related to the amount of dead
volume that is exposed to the system pressure at the instant the
flow path is closed off from the fluid flow." He explains that,
unlike other plastic couplings, the new design minimizes the area
exposed to system pressure to a small annular area, thus minimizing
spillage. An added benefit is the reduction of the annular area,
which separates forces to almost zero, making the coupling quite
easy to operate.
 |
| Figure 1: PTFE
version of the ChemQuik CQN08 coupling on a Semco portable
chemical cart. |
On the semiconductor OEM side, BOC Edwards' Semco unit (Livermore,
CA) uses a PTFE version of the coupling for its portable chemical
cart, which blends and delivers ultrapure chemicals for various
wet process applications (see Figure 1). "It provides a safe and
easy means to connect and disconnect for our customers," notes
Kenneth A. Johnson, Semco's director of product technology. "This
coupling has the ability to connect and disconnect under pressure
with no spill. We have good reports from the chemical technicians
who are responsible for operating and maintaining the equipment.
They really like the push-button, one-hand operation."
The couplings feature a push-button thumb latch to facilitate
one-handed operation and an audible click to confirm a secure,
leak-free connection. "If you want to develop a high-capacity
PTFE coupling that incorporates an easy-to-use plastic thumb latch,"
says Colder's Braun, "then you must isolate the system pressure
from generating a separating force that acts on the thumb latch.
This is especially true when using weaker materials or designing
a large flow coupling."
The separation force trying to push the coupling halves apart
is a function of the pressure area on which the system acts at
any given pressure. In addition, the pressure area increases with
the square of the diameter exposed to fluid pressure. If the diameter
doubles, the resulting separating force increases four times.
This force must be carried by the latching mechanism holding the
two coupling halves together. "Unlike common PTFE ball-and-sleeve
coupling designs, typically rated at <40 psig, this pressure-balanced
design allows the use of an easier-to-operate thumb latch design
rated up to 80 psig," according to Braun.
When the unit is uncoupled, the fluid system pressure acts on
the small annular area for biasing the coupling's two valves so
they stay in the closed position in a fail-safe manner. "Upon
connection, this area is isolated and effectively balanced during
the joining action of the two coupling halves," explains Braun.
The system pressure provides no significant separating force,
except that which is applied to the small annular face area of
the valves. This force, along with the spring bias, is what separates
the coupling halves when the thumb latch is released. A comparison
between different couplings' separation force is illustrated in
Figure 2.
 |
| Figure 2: Comparison between
different couplings' separation force. A lower pressure rating
is desired. |
Unlike poppet-style couplings that spill a significant amount
of fluid when disconnected, the coupling's pressure-balanced,
nonspill design permits connection and disconnection under pressure,
with virtually no spillage (~0.1 ml). Braun points out that "poppet-style
plastic couplings with similar flow capacity will have several
milliliters of spillage versus a fraction of a milliliter for
the new design."
Although metal can be used in couplings, metal corrosion within
and outside of the fluid flow path could result in contamination
that threatens the purity of process fluids. Some manufacturers
have tried to overcome the fluid contamination problem by coating
the coupling valve springs with fluoropolymers or making the spring
from a low tensile strength fluoropolymer material. "Both of these
are unacceptable solutions," Braun believes. "The end result is
that the metal spring's coating either wears or cracks, or eventually
is permeated, becomes corroded, and contaminates the fluid. The
fluoropolymer spring is low force and susceptible to physical
creep, resulting in unreliable sealing and valve leakage."
Because the new design locates springs outside of the flow path
and hermetically encapsulates them in a fluoropolymer plastic,
away from ultrapure and corrosive fluids, the risk of contamination
is virtually eliminated. On the insert or plug side of the coupling,
fluid flows around the edges. On the body or socket side, fluid
flows through the middle. The result is that both springs are
isolated by two degrees of protection from fluid contact, thus
meeting stringent requirements for metallic isolation set by Intel,
IBM, Motorola, Texas Instruments, and other leading chipmakers.
"Removing the metal spring from the fluid path is a major improvement
for a coupling," according to Ashland's Morris. "Colder designed
it so that there isn't any question of contaminating the chemicals.
All the wetted materials are made of PTFE, and we also use Chemraz
O-rings." (Chemraz O-rings are a product of Greene, Tweed, based
in Kulpsville, PA.)
Semco's Johnson concurs. "Colder has gone through years of testing
and field evaluation of the new coupling. Its key design feature
is the metal-free flow path, which eliminates fluid contamination.
After proving the basic design, Colder has added improvements
such as keyed mating, color codes, and various fitting configurations....
The CQN08 is the best coupling I have ever used in this industry."
Does your company have a compelling product or service case study?
If so, contact MICRO''s editors with your story ideas at tom.cheyney@cancom.com
or bob.michaels@cancom.com.

MicroHome |
Search | Current Issue | MicroArchives
Buyers Guide | Media Kit
Questions/comments about MICRO Magazine? E-mail us at cheynman@gmail.com.
© 2007 Tom Cheyney
All rights reserved.
|